Huanzhou Zhu
Senior Member
I actually really like the Asian way of describe the action of float rod. It's a number system, normally you have 19, 28, 37, 46 corresponds to extra fast, fast, medium fast, medium etc.casting weights I pay no attention to what so ever and they would only (at least in this country) be even remotely thought about when it comes to using a plummet on very slow or still waters
I don’t know where they get those figures from.
Line ratings are useful as a guide. It gives you some idea of what the rod is both intended for and what it will roughly deal with before you get into the car and take a completely wasted journey to look at it. I wish every manufacturer of float rod would do this with a brief description of the rod’s action. Eg medium-fast 3-5lb main 4lb HL. Done!
Tells me enough now I can decide if i want to pick it up.
Weight figures are equally useless from my experience. A 180g rod can be identical to a 150g rod in every way but have a different design handle and until you pick them up you’ll have no idea which feels best for you. If manufacturers were to give section weights ……. Now we are talking and again that is information that could be used blind to gather an idea of what a rod might be like before holding it. Unfortunately i doubt we’d ever get there and I’m rambling a bit now with “what if”
Sphere river rods are lovely rods and for their power brackets, they kick the pants out of anything currently made today. I can only suspect the reason for their quick demise would be price as they were extremely expensive and the handle which got so much bad press mostly by people that had never even touched one.
My thoughts are if they had, probably more would of sold as it’s surprisingly comfortable despite being a little long and perhaps a little light
I agree the weight figure is useless, balance is more important.