Lee Poultney
Senior Member
There are several references to eating coarse fish in 'Mr Crabtree Goes Fishing'. It's been happening sice time began.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If it wasn't for their dads flying our Spitfires you may be speaking German Wayne.
They can have a few fish for me, far more important things to worry about.
Agreed there are significant problems in certain areas, but the law states, on any given day you may only remove:
* one pike of up to 65 cm;
* two grayling of 30–38 cm;
* up to a total of 15 small fish of up to 20 cm of the following native species: barbel; chub; common bream; common carp; crucian carp; dace; perch; pike; roach; rudd; silver bream; smelt; and tench.
Fish are measured from the tip of the snout to the fork of the tail.
The people taking coarse fish from the UK’s rivers are not all Polish as the title of thread wrongly indicates.
i asked if that had much trouble with 'big foreheads' poaching.
The legal action in the case of stillwaters could be taken by the police under the theft act. In the case of rivers it would be up to the club to pursue a civil action for damages against those who broke their rules (in England and Wales as wild animals have no owner, in Scotland the theft act also applies to rivers as wild animals belong to the landowner). The EA could only take action that breeches the bye laws. The do not enforce clubs rules for them.Very true Steven, but it does make me laugh when clubs impose rules they cannot and will not enforce.
I am not too sure where this stands legally, but if a club has a ''take no fish policy’’ and someone gets caught taking fish I don’t believe the club can in fact press charges against the perpetrator. Unless they are infringing the bylaw detailed in my previous post and in any case it would have to be the Environment Agency who brought any legal action and how often do you see that happening?
if they have membership, which in alot of cases, not,The legal action in the case of stillwaters could be taken by the police under the theft act. In the case of rivers it would be up to the club to pursue a civil action for damages against those who broke their rules (in England and Wales as wild animals have no owner, in Scotland the theft act also applies to rivers as wild animals belong to the landowner). The EA could only take action that breeches the bye laws. The do not enforce clubs rules for them.
In reality any one breaking a club rule would usually just have their membership ended.
Its all well and good having the new fishery laws, signs in many languages, etc, but if they are not enforced it is just pointless. The EA officers are virtually non existant, and seem to concentrate on commercial fisheries, that volume of man-hours could be reduced by making it a legal requirement for day ticket sellers/fishery owners to require the production of a rod licence before any ticket sale is made, the same for purchasing club books etc. The EA officers could then concentrate on the more vunerable waters, free river stretches etc.
regardless of origin, they should abide by our laws/customs, the fact that they often don,t, is largely down to our lack of enforcement, they know they will generally get away scot free, if challenged at all!!!
peter
Sorry for the long whinge....I just get so fed up with the ever increasing madness of the EU, which seems intent on making us the milk cow for the rest of Europe...and determined to force us to stand still in silence and take it, by imposing this very manufactured madness called 'political correctness' into every corner of our lives....including the original point involving our fish (if you can remember back that far )
Cheers, Dave.
I just get so fed up with the ever increasing madness of the EU, which seems intent on making us the milk cow for the rest of Europe.