To be honest I think this is a futile debate, I sincerely feel that for the most part, man doesn't really know its ar*e from its elbow
With respect (yes, I'm ahead of you there), IMO no debate is "futile" if it makes people stop and think. Very few rules should be 'written in stone' ... it's reasonable for us as humans to reason (as in, 'mull over'). In debates people often enter into discussion with entrenched views, which may be expressed
ad nausium. But we humans do have the power to reflect, consider, weigh up and ... ultimately, eventually ... change our minds, or even better, end up with a more open mind which is ready to truly listen.
IMO there's no 'right' or 'wrong' in this debate, but there is a lot of unknown variables. From this we could conclude : so let's try 12 months fishing for (say) 5 years, and see what the result is. But how would we measure that result? I think at best we'd end up with a mere wobbly guesstimation.
One thing that would be measurable though would be a positive feedback from the tackle trade, but I'm not sure whether this is a facet of the equation that should even be considered. I believe that this debate/argument should be SOLELY about fish welfare, not the welfare of tackle traders (going by the impact of on-line shopping on the High Street, tackle shops are going to continue and increasingly suffering anyway ... outside of caster/maggot/worm sales etc).
My view, for what it's worth : On balance I believe that removing the close season is most likely to provide benefit to the angler and tackle trader rather than the fish, otherwise I don't believe we would be having this discussion. Therefore I'm resistant to change.
If fish welfare
was absolutely paramount then the close season would extended, to cover 99% of the (potential) spawning period (e.g Feb-July!) No, I'm not advocating this ... but there is some truth (and sense) in it. One thing I would advocate though is 'Safe Havens' : known spawning sites being 'Red Flagged'. Bailiffs etc know where (many of) these sites are. The creation of such 'Havens' could result in the best of all worlds ... IMHO (maybe in addition to possibly a shorter close season).
It's a consultation, and I think anglers should be consulted. And in my opinion, discussion is never futile ... only seemingly futile at times.
BTW "
Its like being a swinger and saying, 'I really love my missus!'". Woooooh, where did that one come from? "Love" is a subjective term with wide ranging definitions, many '
loves' are based on 'felt needs' and insecurities (e.g. "I need you, therefore it must be love"). To say that swinging couples don't actually/can't love each other ... that's a tad sweeping, damning, and somewhat dismissively elitist IMO. Just sayin'.