Lee, I can't agree with you here. I don't think it is possible to define what the internet is and so I can't see how it can be described as "a force for clarity, truth, entertainment and learning". There is no prescription to its purpose or it's outputs. It is simply what those that use it choose it to be. In many ways it's simply a digital world that mirrors the real world an as such it contains the dark and light of life. However, what I think you can see is a distortion simply because of the fluidity of identity-something that has nothing to do with clarity or truth.
I personally don't see the point of trying to predict the future of the forum because we, as members, are empowered to make it the place we want it to be. Moderation can be applied as we know but again, if that does not suit people then they can move on.
I read most threads and over the last year have witnessed many debates and robust exchanges on matters ranging from predation, the use of braid, the conflicting interests of those that use the waterways, politics and so on. All of these have been allowed to develop and take there natural course. However, there has undoubtedly been an element that have made highly provocative posts where the intent has simply been to undermine or even destabilise the forum, simply for the warped pleasure of doing so. I think it is in these situations that moderation has been appropriately deployed leading to bans.
I have looked in on the other site and members there are no doubt looking in on this thread now, and it wasn't for me. So I have made the simple choice not to engage with it. That's the beauty of empowerment and having and then acting on choice.
I don't know what people really expect from this forum. At the end of the day there is only so many fishing related matters you can debate which is why we see repeats. But, it is a sport that evolves- tackle, bait and perhaps most critically of all, the state and welfare of the rivers and the fish and the fishing. All of which make things current.