Neil Smart
Senior Member
Anyone know why Barbel in France seem to co.exist along side Otter?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anyone know why Barbel in France seem to co.exist along side Otter?
In Teme/Arrow/Kennet/BAvon sized rivers Neil?
One family of otters could easily (IMO) wipe out a mile of narrow river of (esp the larger, slower) barbel in a year or so.
Yep, 'fox in the henhouse'. My neighbour lost a few thousand quids worth..in one single night (otter footprints found).Otters do mass kill.
Just look at some of the garden ponds with multiple kills. They do have feeding frenzy times and will happily seek out the oil
richest part of fish.
And a family of Otters prior to the adults pushing youngsters away, could affect many miles of river.
I agree with you that otters are not likely to be the sole cause Neil, but otters turning up in numbers as/when they did appear tantamount to a 'smoking gun'.I don't know Terry what the facts are in France, but it might be worthwhile delving into. I am not championing the Otter, but I have this feeling that all this decline in Barbel numbers should not be attributed to just the Otter, or predation come to that. Let's be honest we don't see the evidence of fish kill do we? And that my friend is quite possibly the biggest flaw the Otter blamers have. If at least say 100 Barbel were being killed every season on the Teme, I am sure there would be the evidence...however I do see Barbel belly up through you know why.
Otters do mass kill.
Just look at some of the garden ponds with multiple kills. They do have feeding frenzy times and will happily seek out the oil
richest part of fish.
And a family of Otters prior to the adults pushing youngsters away, could affect many miles of river.
Yes I know of all these killings, and I despair too, but I cannot think of anytime in the future that we as anglers can influence the culling of Otters, let's face it the Otter is indigenous whereas the Barbel was introduced from the Eastern Rivers. The reintroduction of the Otter is lauded as a huge success story by the public. It hurts it really does, when I see so many Rivers now devoid of Barbel it reduces me to tears, but that feeling is not shared beyond those that fish for them.
The reintroduction of the Beaver is now growing into a real force, this is the way the future, unless these species prove a hazard to the farming community I feel we have to accept our lot, and just try and protect what we have and hold.
Something us wrong, when I look into the Teme I see little life, and if the Otter is responsible for that I will be very surprised, it is so different to just a few years back, as is the Arrow, it seems to me that it could be a far less obvious suspect than the Otter.
I think it would be unlikely that these rivers being devoid of natural life can be attributed to the actions of the Otter Derek. By life not just fry and adult fish but insect larvae, and the nornal vegetation one would normally see, which possibly points to chemical pollution rather than mass predation.Neil, maybe, as Lawrence has said above, if there are no females to lay the eggs, then sadly, there will be no fry.
Craig you must know as I do, any carcass is not just wiped out in a couple of hours, it takes days if not weeks to go, how many Pike carcass do we see that hang around for days/ weeks? This is the nagging doubt I have, as others do, if they were killing en mass surely there would be the evidence,? We simply don't have it.
Hello Craig ,how do you know this is a fact ? I have regularly seen otters on the Yorkshire Ouse for over 15 years and I have not noticed any decline in the Barbel population
Possibly Craig, but from what I see is that carcasses just don't vanish down some hole in the ground, they are picked at for days, it's how flies actually earn their living , can you imagine the mess if Badgers or Fox brought that stuff home? Besides Badger and Fox suckle their young so there is no real incentive to carry the carcass away, they would normally scavenge what they can on site, and leave the rest. Apologies if I am doubting your information, perhaps you could point me to the article. ?Hi Neil ,
I believe the carcass is taken away by foxes or badgers. I was reading a article about this , whereas badgers and foxes were seen regularly patrolling rivers.
Possibly Craig, but from what I see is that carcasses just don't vanish down some hole in the ground, they are picked at for days, it's how flies actually earn their living , can you imagine the mess if Badgers or Fox brought that stuff home? Besides Badger and Fox suckle their young so there is no real incentive to carry the carcass away, they would normally scavenge what they can on site, and leave the rest. Apologies if I am doubting your information, perhaps you could point me to the article. ?
Hello Craig . I don't doubt for a moment that Barbel populations do decrease , often dramatically on some rivers when Otters appear , indeed I have seen this happen on stretches of the river Nidd . One stretch that I am thinking off had a large head of barbel , then Otters began to appear and over time the Barbel and chub became much harder to catch and in the end I gave up on the stretch as the bigger fish population seemed to have disappeared . This said I did not see a single Barbel or Chub carcass , piles of scales , nothing . I have no doubt the OtterHi Mike , Well firstly I hope that scenario continues on the Yorkshire Ouse , unfortunately many Rivers have seen their Barbel stocks diminish , once Otters claim that area as their territory. No coincidence Mike.
Anyone know why Barbel in France seem to co.exist along side Otter?
If before the reintroduction of otter barbel were surviving quite well and breeding in rivers where now post the reintroductions they are not what has changed in those rivers?
Stretches of small rivers that previously held populations of barbel of varying sizes are now devoid of barbel since the sighting of otter on those stretches, nothing as far as I know has changed other than otter appearing on the river, coincidence? I don't think it is.
Yes I think that is a very valid point, from nothing to an introduction en mass has had devastating consequences, and as you say the hand reared element sure;y is a factor. As we know over centuries nature adapts and things level out with the correct numbers of prey vs hunters. It was pretty obvious to all and sundry to have an apex predator thrown into the mix there would be some carnage, they must have know that but thought perhaps it was worth it.?Wirh any introduction or re introduction of new species you will always get a surge in numbers.
Think Severn barbel situation.
But many of the otters released were hand reared or cared for in groups.
The natural competitive nature and fear of humans probably lessened.
Just a thought.