Ever ready to have a dig young Andrew, you rascal
Thankfully, the critters reportedly seen below my stretch, which alarmed me so much....were either mink mistakenly identified as otters, or a figment of someone's imagination. It may even be that they were otters, but decided to go back from whence they came. I gather they will not take up residence in areas where dog excrement is present on the bank to any extent...and lord knows there is masses of that on my local
Either way, there have been no sightings reported since. My local is a small, shallowish river, and much of it runs through/near heavily populated areas...so I think it unlikely there are any otters present, or they would surely have been seen. Thank gawd
As for the fish you mention....it was only claimed at a few ounces bigger than the previous record, and without proper authentication and scales checks etc. taking place (as in those required for a national record to be upheld)...I would not necessarily assume it was exactly the weight claimed. Not that I am suggesting for one second that deliberate deception has taken place...it is just that virtually all scales may easily be a few ounces out, which is why they are checked and the claimed weight adjusted to suit once a national record has been claimed. If the fish had been a pound or two bigger, THEN I would have sat up and taken notice
Incidentally, your short term memory loss must be worse than mine...and I am 70 this year. That post you mention was only a matter of months back, not 'a season or two'. It must be all those red herrings you keep swallowing.....
Cheers, Dave.