I wrote the below post this morning, but didn't have time to finish it, much less post it, before I was dragged out kicking and squealing by SWMBO to help with the Christmas shopping
Now I am back, I have sort of finished it, and will post it anyway, because despite several answering posts appearing since that time, it is still what I would have liked to have said. Obviously it is only my opinion, my take on the world situation as I see it. I find it sad that Roman has taken my previous post as an angry response...but it certainly was not intended to be aggressive....I rather think that it suited you to see it that way Roman...but...whatever. I shall try hard not to let that bother me
As for Kevins wish that I stop nicking his Tiger nuts (I think that's what he said
) I have plenty of my own, thank you very much
Seriously though Kevin, I believe the future of the European eel is inextricably mixed in with the survival of the worlds wildlife in general. I only widened the scope of the argument to try to illustrate the scale of the problem to Roman. Sadly, that has only resulted in him accusing me of racism. I can't be bothered to point out to him that his reply is the typical parrot like response I expected from him...he has been well and truly brainwashed by this bizarre, treading-on-egg-shells world we now live in. Ask a certain football referee what he thinks of this jump on the bandwagon style of insult
And Kevin...I promise that is my last word on this. I shall now back off, apologising profusely for stealing your thread (I had my fingers crossed as I wrote those last six words
)
what about the poor old sandeel?
being killed and crushed up by the millions, into pellets for the fish farming industry...
Only the fish farming industry Tim? Fish meal is used in animal feed for virtually every animal farmed, plus it is used in human food products, even fertilizer....and we use it in our bait. But you are right...we are very, very guilty of enormous crimes against the well-being of our natural world. Which is why there are huge battles going on in every country in the world to try to put as much of that right as we possibly can. There are in fact big battles going on to reduce this fish meal industry because it is considered a hugely wasteful process. The point is, at least we are
trying to reduce our consumption,
trying to do something about this dreadful situation, and many of the other wrongs we have battered our world with. Actually, it has occurred to me (though I doubt very much that I am the first to see this
) that there is one anomaly in our system that was bought about during our struggles to stop the over fishing in our seas that can surely make a huge difference to this fish meal emergency. Basically, the fishing industry quota system has proved to be a nonsense. It seems that 40% to 50% of all fish landed by our fleet are thrown back into the sea....dead! The system demands that once a boat has caught it's quota of any given species, then any further fish of that species accidentally caught whilst fishing for other species...must be thrown back, even though they are inevitably killed in the process. Surely those already dead fish could be used to manufacture fish meal? And surely some at least of the carcasses of the sharks killed purely for their fins could also be used for that? Obviously there are implications and complications, because nothing is that simple...but it could be made to work. I am sure that if the caring people who fight our battles for us manage to win some of their current campaigns...then it will be.
None of us are free of guilt, the only redeeming feature we have in the west is our recognition of the harm we have done (and are still doing)...and our attempts at putting that right. This ethical stance is nothing new, it has been going on for many, many years...but it is undeniable that it has only been reasonably effective for one or two generations. The west's efforts in enforcing whaling bans, big game hunting bans, rationing of commercial fish catches, setting up of animal reserves and national parks, banning trade in ivory, reducing the trade in animal furs, the reduction in the use of fossil fules, the drive for green energy...and a thousand and one other attempts at mitigating the damage we do...are beginning to have at least some effect.
However, despite these efforts, the survival of much of the worlds wildlife is now in the balance. It has reached the point where it may or may not survive (in any meaningful numbers at least) for our children and grandchildren to enjoy. Are we mending our ways in time to save some of these wonders of our world? I don't know. I have hope...but not too much confidence. What I DO know is that the worlds wildlife has absolutely zero chance of surviving the ravages of another wave of emerging nations, especially when those nations have no interest in learning from our mistakes. It may seem that we don't have a right to preach to anyone, if we think in terms of our own sins. However we do in fact have a right, no a
duty...to do whatever we can to help what little is left to survive. We have to put aside any guilt at being accused of hypocrisy....whales and mountain gorillas etc. cant afford niceties like that on our part, in fact their lives depend upon our being a tad thick skinned in that regard
However, as I said to begin with....this is all just the way I see things. Make of it what you will
Carry on Kevin....I am done mate, as promised.
Cheers, Dave.