The only thing I can say Alex and Simon is look at the Teme and how that river got its Barbel, fortunately we only have to go back 30 years and we can see in our life time how Barbel colonization works, ok it may have happened with the Thames 10,000 years ago, but I still believe the mother river i.e. the Thames or the Severn would be the source of Barbel pushing on instinctively to explore other habitats whether it was a 1000 years ago or or 20 years ago.....with one proviso, that is that the mother rivers own Barbel population was not in decline, I know illegal stckings take place and are successful, you only have to see the Wye for that, but I believe that every mother river has an epicenter of breeding, that ultimately effects the whole of its tributary system with Barbel as they swim up and down to colonize, I consider the middle Severn to be the Severn's area, it doesnt mean that Barbel dont breed in these tributaries, it means they dont get that natural push from behind as fresh fish enter the system, as Barbel push other fish out I do believe they also push their own species forever on and up....[/QUOTE
Lawrence, i have no doubt that the Cherwell like many other tributaries of the Thames originally had an indigenous population of Barbel, the point i was making was that many others came from various stockings of one kind or other, what i would love to know is WHERE exactly some of those groups of fish originated from, anyone who can shed any light on that please speak up because i've never been able to find out. Hence my post.