Dave Taylor
Senior Member
Hi guys
The "Special fish you have lost " thread reminded me of an unfortunate incident that happened to me on the lower Throop 30 odd years ago.
At that time I was using Mitchell 300s fixed spools that,.. along with many other reels at the time had notoriously unreliable clutches.
I was fishing for barbel below the weir and had just played out a fish of around the 4-5 lb mark which seemed ready for the net. Reel-spinners and backwinding were my preferred methods then, and when I was convinced that a fish was ready for the net I would click the anti reverse on and net the fish.
Just as the barbel was under the rod tip and " ready " one of the biggest pike I have seen in a river suddenly grasped the barbel across it's flanks and proceeded to cruise off. Because the anti reverse was on the rod tip disappeared under the surface as I dropped the net and struggled to disengage it.
The end result was an almighty splash and snapped mainline which left me standing with rod in hand, soaked and shocked!
As clutches have become smoother and more reliable I always use them for my fishing but are there some of you who prefer not to? As reels have evolved to become bigger and stand off the butt further it's difficult to use a finger to brake the spool if the clutch were not used.
This would not apply to a centre pin of course which I find easy to control how much line to give a fish.
I think I remember Tony Miles writing about this once, and concluding that many anglers were inclined to give more line to a running fish if not using the clutch.
Any thoughts?
dt
The "Special fish you have lost " thread reminded me of an unfortunate incident that happened to me on the lower Throop 30 odd years ago.
At that time I was using Mitchell 300s fixed spools that,.. along with many other reels at the time had notoriously unreliable clutches.
I was fishing for barbel below the weir and had just played out a fish of around the 4-5 lb mark which seemed ready for the net. Reel-spinners and backwinding were my preferred methods then, and when I was convinced that a fish was ready for the net I would click the anti reverse on and net the fish.
Just as the barbel was under the rod tip and " ready " one of the biggest pike I have seen in a river suddenly grasped the barbel across it's flanks and proceeded to cruise off. Because the anti reverse was on the rod tip disappeared under the surface as I dropped the net and struggled to disengage it.
The end result was an almighty splash and snapped mainline which left me standing with rod in hand, soaked and shocked!
As clutches have become smoother and more reliable I always use them for my fishing but are there some of you who prefer not to? As reels have evolved to become bigger and stand off the butt further it's difficult to use a finger to brake the spool if the clutch were not used.
This would not apply to a centre pin of course which I find easy to control how much line to give a fish.
I think I remember Tony Miles writing about this once, and concluding that many anglers were inclined to give more line to a running fish if not using the clutch.
Any thoughts?
dt