Paul Dowgill
Senior Member
We can be sure there will be no cash to spend on the environment...or any more control over water companies/industrial discharge, so not perhaps a great day from a fishing perspective.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just as well you live in Ferndown Phil
But how is this bad news for anyone? Look at the economy now as it was then under those clowns, all this Labour for the 'poor working man' load of rubbish.
Can't see Labour getting back any time soon too
R.I.P Labour.
Don't see where I live has anything to do with it, I obviously didn't realise that it was "the clowns" who caused the global economy to fall. I thought it was the banks that weren't regulated enough by labour and am obviously mistaken when thinking that the tories wanted them deregulated more, funny how people remember what they want to.
Go and talk to the people at the bottom of the food chain to see if they feel happy about where the economy is and see if they feel better off"
Well said. Right up until the Lehman Bros collapse in 2008 which took with it the American sub-prime housing market which triggered the global banking/economic crisis, the Conservative party was vociferously calling for further deregulation - look at Hansard online.
This is what Gideon Oz and co had to say on the subject of mortgage lending:
"We see no need to continue to regulate the provision of mortgage finance, as it is the lending institutions rather than the client taking the risk."
Freeing Britain to Compete, Final Report of the Conservative Party Economic Competitiveness Policy Group, Published 17 August 2007
[I
“In financial services we should allow people to buy and sell products that are not regulated if they have signed to do so.â€[/I]
Economic Competitiveness Policy Group, Chairmen’s Presentation to David Cameron and Colleagues 26 September 2006.
Vince Cable was the only mainstream politician that called it. Fact.
Neil
Its very easy to penalize those much less well off than your self - when they start actually dealing with tax avoidance by their mates you may have a point but so far there has been no evidence of this - so competent maybe if you have a lot of money...their plans are not costed, so lets see what happens with indirect taxation which of course hits the less well off more proportionally and the NHS as private health care ain't cheap...and of course as noted above 24% of those eligible to vote ain't exactly the strongest mandate...
Of course world events are a factor, from fiscal to war, but it is how to cope in your own country in good governance. The labour party has demonstrated that they are not up to the job, be it Blair or Brown, and the people have voted more for a no confidence in Labour more than anything else, never mind what manifesto they put forward.
Today at least we still have a competent leader and a competent government at the helm, phew!!
OK Ray I get your message, just to say though with all the issues put in front of the people, the people voted 'Dave' back in, can't argue with that really, it's DemocracyAnother post appeared as i was writing this, but i will post it anyway.
A competent gov't my backside. What we now have is a corrupt gov't. A gov't stuffed with self serving pigs at the trough of riches. When Camoron made his we are all in it together speech, he wasn't aiming at you and me, it was to his rich buddies in and out of gov't who have fingers of greed in every pie you can think of.
We have a crumbling Health service needing (if my figures are correct) £8bn
over the next parliament to get back on track (pun intended), so what will this govt do, they will spend £50bn minimum for a one off stupid train to cut a train journey by 20minutes. Miles of landscape ruined, many people will lose there houses etc etc. I t has already cost the taxpayer a staggering £1bn and it hasn;t even been approved yet. I bet Daves mates are rubbing there hands with glee at the prospect of many many more millions of taxpayers money dropping in to there bank accounts.
the people voted 'Dave' back in, can't argue with that really, it's Democracy
Sadly, 75% of those eligible to vote didn't vote for David.
HS2 is a clever move. By the time the next election comes around and David and his mates are measured by the austerity and cuts that have been enforced, whoever is voted into power will be saddled with the burden of HS2. As such they are unlikely to stay in office for more than one term....because of the cuts that will have been necessary to pay for it!
Voting under a proportional representation would make it more democratic than the first past the post system we use. EG Scotland get %3.5 of the vote and 50 odd seats, UKIP get %12.5 of the votes and get one seat.
That's depending if HS2 is concerned a success or a white Elephant, doubt even it was unpopular would bring the Government down, it's a project that ensures Britain can keep pace with the modern world, surely you can see that?
Concord, Titanic and now HS2