I see no way out of this. Even if we voice our feelings regarding predation (particularly the otter situation) on this or other forums too loudly, we are liable to be shot down in flames for our 'non PC views' or whatever. Just imagine then how such views are received by the non angling fraternity
I admit I don't know the answer, because the obvious one is never going to happen...which leaves us in a bit of a quandary, does it not? We could try sea fishing, but then cormorants are on our rivers because of lack of fish in our coastal waters...or so I am told. (To be honest, that's a bit of a red herring, if you will excuse the pun
) Fly fishing would possibly be an option...but I see no reason why trout waters will not eventually be affected in just the same way.
Besides, I rather like fishing the way I do....I am a terribly selfish old fool like that. In fact, I would go as far as to say that I find the views often expressed in support of these 'natural predators'
, such as 'If you don't like it, you will have to lump it', or 'They have more right to be here than you do' et al....both tiresome and boring. But then that's just me, and we are all entitled to our own opinion. However, I do find it rather amusing how opinions can suddenly change when the person concerned finds to their horror that it is now their rivers turn to be the one being ravaged
Golf any one?
Cheers, Dave.