• You need to be a registered member of Barbel Fishing World to post on these forums. Some of the forums are hidden from non-members. Please refer to the instructions on the ‘Register’ page for details of how to join the new incarnation of BFW...

lighter float rod

Thanks Chris, it’s definitely for trotting, not stillwater, and by lighter I meant rod power, more silvers and chub than barbel. How do you rate the Acolyte 17’ against the Browning Sphere ?

I prefer the Sphere. After initial misgivings about the Spheres, they have become my favourite float rods ever. If they did a 15'+ Sphere Match rod, I doubt I'd be using any other float rods. The reason I do use other rods is largely to check if my liking of them is still warranted. Besides, a change is as good as a rest.

I tend to consider the rest of the Acolyte (match/float) rods (15' and less) as being very similar to each other. However, the 17' Acolyte is an oddity. If you are familiar with the actions of the rest of the Acolyte float rods, don't expect the 17'er to be the same but longer. It's a fine rod, but it has a slightly odd (to me) action. Any fish over 6oz or so will feel like a beauty until you get used to it. Once you do, you come to appreciate that it's not as feeble as you might think. I doubt that I'd take it to deliberately target barbel. However, I've had some decent trout and chub on the river and a few 6lb+ tench, from a weedy water, without an issue.
 
Only a waggle. Like a few too many modern Daiwas, and a lot of specimen float rods, I felt it was a bit too flabby to be much fun when trotting. However, I can't deny that I've never used one in anger. However, the 14' waggler is listed as being 200g. The power 14'er is 205g, the 15' waggler is 215g, the power 15'er is 221g and the 17'er is 256g.

To give some perspective, my own Acolyte Float 17' has been weighed at 199g and I believe my scales are weighing slightly heavy. I've encountered heavier power type float rods than the current Connoisseurs, but they still wouldn't be for me. That's not to say that they don't have fantastic actions, but I couldn't say either way.
I’d imagined the acolyte would be much lighter. My compact plus I use on the small rivers down this way is unbelievably light.
I’m pondering with the idea of something a little more powerful myself but with another couple of feet on the length too.
I don’t want a poker or even a really powerful rod because no matter what I’m trotting for the finesse side of things is important to me as that’s half the fun in float rods.
I’ve always believed my acolyte to be a big chub rod that could handle an occasional barbel.

I’m going to fish further a field next season with the float gear and target bigger fish on bigger rivers.
Ideally I want a float rod suitable for barbel but not “too” suitable if that makes sense.
 
purchased an Acolyte 17’ today, was good to find one in store so I could have a waggle and put a bend in it, surprising power as Chris mentioned. So now … what reel ? Was thinking a Stradic 3000 but fancy a change, was looking at browning and Preston Inn match reels, anyone got them or feedback ? Thanks gents
 
I’d imagined the acolyte would be much lighter. My compact plus I use on the small rivers down this way is unbelievably light.
I’m pondering with the idea of something a little more powerful myself but with another couple of feet on the length too.
I don’t want a poker or even a really powerful rod because no matter what I’m trotting for the finesse side of things is important to me as that’s half the fun in float rods.
I’ve always believed my acolyte to be a big chub rod that could handle an occasional barbel.

I’m going to fish further a field next season with the float gear and target bigger fish on bigger rivers.
Ideally I want a float rod suitable for barbel but not “too” suitable if that makes sense.
Rich I'll keep you updated on my limited use of the connoisseur if any use. Ived Used a lot of decent rods including the actolyte plus cheers Jon
 
purchased an Acolyte 17’ today, was good to find one in store so I could have a waggle and put a bend in it, surprising power as Chris mentioned. So now … what reel ? Was thinking a Stradic 3000 but fancy a change, was looking at browning and Preston Inn match reels, anyone got them or feedback ? Thanks gents
Having now had a couple of modern stradics apart (got an 4000Fb in at moment) and done some minor repairs I’d personally not buy one despite the model.

They are lovely operating things I can’t deny that but it’s sad to say they don’t share the same quality and part durability or tolerance accuracy as the older gtm models.
 
Edit on the post above……. I’ve not had anything to do with the Ci4 models. These are more expensive and possibly could be much better….. I wouldn’t know
 
They are lovely operating things I can’t deny that but it’s sad to say they don’t share the same quality and part durability or tolerance accuracy as the older gtm models.

I seem to remember paying about £120 for an original Japanese made Stradic GTM in the mid-nineties. Setting the date to (a slightly flattering) 1998 and plugging £120 into the Bank of England inflation calculator suggests that would equate to £224.69 in 2021. A modern Stradic GTM RC is likely to cost you somewhere between £100 and £120. It's almost inevitable that a GTM RC won't be the same quality as an original GTM, it's effectively quite a bit cheaper.

I have some "better" modern Shimano rear drag reels in the form of the Stradic Ci4+ RAs and Twinpower Ci4 RAs. I also have a couple of original Stradic GTMs that are still in very good condition. Whilst the build quality and durability of the old reels may well prove to be better than the modern reels, I much prefer to use the modern ones. Whilst the originals are built like battleships, they weigh about as much as one too. However, I have a distinct preference for the far larger diameter spools found on the modern reels. The fact that the use of the more modern body/rotor materials can offset the extra weight of bigger spools, and result in reels that are still significantly lighter, is a big plus point.

All that said it's worth adding that I view such reels through the eyes of a float angler. I won't be repeatedly cranking in big feeders/leads on such reels. A larger diameter spool allows me to cast lighter floats far further and results in far less line memory/coiling. A larger spool results in less of a reach to the lip of the spool. The oversized spools might also allow the use of a significantly smaller lighter model whilst still having a greater spool diameter. Lighter weight reels are certainly far more appropriate for very light (weight) float rods.
 
I seem to remember paying about £120 for an original Japanese made Stradic GTM in the mid-nineties. Setting the date to (a slightly flattering) 1998 and plugging £120 into the Bank of England inflation calculator suggests that would equate to £224.69 in 2021. A modern Stradic GTM RC is likely to cost you somewhere between £100 and £120. It's almost inevitable that a GTM RC won't be the same quality as an original GTM, it's effectively quite a bit cheaper.

I have some "better" modern Shimano rear drag reels in the form of the Stradic Ci4+ RAs and Twinpower Ci4 RAs. I also have a couple of original Stradic GTMs that are still in very good condition. Whilst the build quality and durability of the old reels may well prove to be better than the modern reels, I much prefer to use the modern ones. Whilst the originals are built like battleships, they weigh about as much as one too. However, I have a distinct preference for the far larger diameter spools found on the modern reels. The fact that the use of the more modern body/rotor materials can offset the extra weight of bigger spools, and result in reels that are still significantly lighter, is a big plus point.

All that said it's worth adding that I view such reels through the eyes of a float angler. I won't be repeatedly cranking in big feeders/leads on such reels. A larger diameter spool allows me to cast lighter floats far further and results in far less line memory/coiling. A larger spool results in less of a reach to the lip of the spool. The oversized spools might also allow the use of a significantly smaller lighter model whilst still having a greater spool diameter. Lighter weight reels are certainly far more appropriate for very light (weight) float rods.
Chris I’ve no doubt that the modern stradics are preferable to you and many for float fishing.

I did nearly 20 years float fishing the river swale before doing much less of it when I moved down south and I agree entirely that the lighter reel with bigger circumference spool is better for both pay off and finger line control. The line lay is imo better on a longer nosed spool with the slower oscillation but let’s be honest that’s neither here nor there when trotting and probably more important for casting distance.

My post was 100% based around pulling these things apart and having a poke and a prod about. Carrying out services and minor repair jobs and there are significant quality differences in both design and durability. I’m excluding the Ci4 models from that statement because I’ll never make factual assumptions on something I haven’t worked on. I’ll give my honest opinion on those should the time ever come!
Now I’m not one of these idiots that just says “get the old ones because they are made better” as these idiots generally wouldn’t know the first thing about the guts of their reels let alone how they work or how to look after them.
In the same respect you get idiots that say “get the new ones as the old ones are crap and dated technology”
I base my opinion on a truly non bios perspective and on what’s physically laid out infront of me.

Classic example is main gearing engaged by the handle. I’m yet to open up a shimano reel that doesn’t use die cast gears made from whatever alloy it is. They work fine but the tolerances of those parts are never going to match something that’s been precisely machined like they did in the Swedish Abus and the original Japanese SS reels.
We all know shimanos bail arms have generally got thinner but so have the retractable bail springs and there is now more movement than ever in the internal trip pin. A lot of modern shimanos have swapped a bearing on the underside of the main gear for a bush (still call it a bearing) and one I opened up last week has a plastic gear operating the oscillation worm drive. I’m sure these we’re always brass in the past.

So in a nutshell I’m not criticizing anything to do regarding the performance of these reels as once I repair them, they feel amazing to use but there are quality differences is all I was pointing out.

I don’t know this for sure but I’d assume shimano would use self tapping screws on materials like the Ci4 body’s?? They did on the Xt bodies I know that.
Where as on the white alloy body’s the screws are all fine threaded with a weak loctite on the tread. You’ll never wreck that thread no matter how many times you service it yet a self tapped thread into a graphite type body …. Only so many times and one over tighten and it’s done!

I see things in detail that others probably don’t really care about and that’s fine.

One last thing though.. your reels will probably last you a life time Chris with no trouble whatsoever. Float anglers are by far the most careful when it comes to looking after there stuff. Rarely do I ever have a repair to do on a float anglers reel.
I put that down to the fact that everything a float anglers uses is far more delicate than other forms of angling from rods to lines to the floats themselves and the anglers take extra care of it as you know it doesn’t take much to break something.
 
Quote
One last thing though.. your reels will probably last you a life time Chris with no trouble whatsoever. Float anglers are by far the most careful when it comes to looking after there stuff. Rarely do I ever have a repair to do on a float anglers reel.

Unless you wash them in soapy water and allow 10 ounces of maggot dust to collect on them for a week or so.
 
I have a couple of old 3000 Aero GTM reels.

Solid, but I don't actually like the exaggerated rise and fall of the spool so much, adds a slight throb to the feel of the rod.
 
Edit on the post above……. I’ve not had anything to do with the Ci4 models. These are more expensive and possibly could be much better….. I wouldn’t know
Rich, Ive got a Ci4 Stradic 4000 I use for float fishing for barbel, its a quality bit of kit as long as you can live with no backwind. I can't comment on the internal workings, I never open them up !!
 
I have a couple of old 3000 Aero GTM reels.

Solid, but I don't actually like the exaggerated rise and fall of the spool so much, adds a slight throb to the feel of the rod.
That’s a combination of a long nosed spool and dual speed oscillation. It’s got a bit of a snap when the slow rise goes into a fast fall on the worm track. It’s unbeatable for line lay imo but yes you do feel it slightly through the rod.
 
Chris I’ve no doubt that the modern stradics are preferable to you and many for float fishing.

I did nearly 20 years float fishing the river swale before doing much less of it when I moved down south and I agree entirely that the lighter reel with bigger circumference spool is better for both pay off and finger line control. The line lay is imo better on a longer nosed spool with the slower oscillation but let’s be honest that’s neither here nor there when trotting and probably more important for casting distance.

My post was 100% based around pulling these things apart and having a poke and a prod about. Carrying out services and minor repair jobs and there are significant quality differences in both design and durability. I’m excluding the Ci4 models from that statement because I’ll never make factual assumptions on something I haven’t worked on. I’ll give my honest opinion on those should the time ever come!
Now I’m not one of these idiots that just says “get the old ones because they are made better” as these idiots generally wouldn’t know the first thing about the guts of their reels let alone how they work or how to look after them.
In the same respect you get idiots that say “get the new ones as the old ones are crap and dated technology”
I base my opinion on a truly non bios perspective and on what’s physically laid out infront of me.

Classic example is main gearing engaged by the handle. I’m yet to open up a shimano reel that doesn’t use die cast gears made from whatever alloy it is. They work fine but the tolerances of those parts are never going to match something that’s been precisely machined like they did in the Swedish Abus and the original Japanese SS reels.
We all know shimanos bail arms have generally got thinner but so have the retractable bail springs and there is now more movement than ever in the internal trip pin. A lot of modern shimanos have swapped a bearing on the underside of the main gear for a bush (still call it a bearing) and one I opened up last week has a plastic gear operating the oscillation worm drive. I’m sure these we’re always brass in the past.

So in a nutshell I’m not criticizing anything to do regarding the performance of these reels as once I repair them, they feel amazing to use but there are quality differences is all I was pointing out.

I don’t know this for sure but I’d assume shimano would use self tapping screws on materials like the Ci4 body’s?? They did on the Xt bodies I know that.
Where as on the white alloy body’s the screws are all fine threaded with a weak loctite on the tread. You’ll never wreck that thread no matter how many times you service it yet a self tapped thread into a graphite type body …. Only so many times and one over tighten and it’s done!

I see things in detail that others probably don’t really care about and that’s fine.

One last thing though.. your reels will probably last you a life time Chris with no trouble whatsoever. Float anglers are by far the most careful when it comes to looking after there stuff. Rarely do I ever have a repair to do on a float anglers reel.
I put that down to the fact that everything a float anglers uses is far more delicate than other forms of angling from rods to lines to the floats themselves and the anglers take extra care of it as you know it doesn’t take much to break something.

The main point I was making was that comparing original Stradic GTMs to modern Stradic GTM RCs might appear to be fair, but it's not really. Whilst the name itself is directly descended from the original, the adjusted for inflation price differential suggests that something must have been lost along the way. The original Stradic GTMs were definitely top of the line rear drag reels in their day. Until an apparent model cull this year, the descendant RA, RB and current RC variants have not been top of the range.

I don't dispute anything regarding the comparison of internal components. However, whilst over-engineered products are often highly prized, I do wonder whether such quality was ever absolutely necessary. I have some doubts that anyone would pay £225+ for a modern original Stradic GTM. The fact is that my original Stradic GTMs have long outlived their usefulness. The big plus is that they still retain some value. The problem with that is that I'm hopeless at actually selling anything. At somewhere near ten years old, perhaps the TwinPower Ci4 RAs are marching steadily on to a similar fate. Whilst acknowledging that floatfishing does impart less strain on a reel, I often wonder what some folks actually do with reels to destroy them. I suspect that lots of folks are lacking in any level of mechanical sympathy. I also wince when I see folks that routinely dunk reels in the water for no apparent reason at all. Great news for reel repairers and manufacturers, not so good for the reels.

Rich, Ive got a Ci4 Stradic 4000 I use for float fishing for barbel, its a quality bit of kit as long as you can live with no backwind. I can't comment on the internal workings, I never open them up !!

Cliff, if you can still find one (they aren't in the current catalogue), give the Stradic Ci4+ RA (2500 or 4000) a looking at. The rear drag Shimanos have, so far, yet to do away with the anti-reverse switch. Nowhere near as light as the much more diminutive front drag Ci4+ Stradic RB though. I tried the 2500 version and found that the lack of anti-reverse switch wasn't an insurmountable problem. However, I do tend to use a drag to play fish anyway. I still found myself reaching for a switch that wasn't there in some situations. I'm sure I could have got used to it, I just didn't want to. Nice enough reel though.
 
I don't dispute anything regarding the comparison of internal components. However, whilst over-engineered products are often highly prized, I do wonder whether such quality was ever absolutely necessary.
Now this is a very interesting point you raise because in many instances your right. These reels can be over engineered but that entirely depends on what is done with them and how frequently.
You know as well as I do that nowadays most if not all decent little reels are classed as “spinning reels” and a lot are tailored to salt water abuse. As course anglers we ain’t gonna hurt them really unless it’s an accident or abuse. Some of them will spend the rest of their lives living in a box and deal with the odd roach once a fortnight.
My reels are used an absolute minimum twice a week and often more. They get a hammering and generally being well engineered is required but certainly frequent servicing as a minimum. I’m a big fan of the old tournaments nowadays. They are built with both frequent use and service in mind and despite their agricultural feel when off the rod, they transform into this perfect little engine when on the rod. I let my D’s go in favour of a pair of 30 year SS 850’s due to the fact they are imo superior in nearly every way.

My stradic gtmH is pretty redundant now and quite often gets left behind for a little ss750.

Along with being brilliant at every thing I want them to do,They are definitely over engineered I cannot see them getting anything like the abuse they were built to cope with but I quite like having that in reserve personally.

Be interesting to know what your lightest Ci4 weighs actually as I reckon it would be very close to the baby torny
 
Back
Top