So Julian, why is it fish on some stretches become so besotted with trout pellets ? They are a pretty high food value.[/
Simon, a barbel does not eat trout pellets because they consider them 'pretty high food value'. Trout pellets are very attractive to most of our coarse fish and have been developed by scientists within aquaculture which I am sure the massive majority are aware of. It is a huge misconception and legacy from the 70's that fish can 'recognise' a food that has a 'higher nutritional value'. HNV also seems to be another way of saying high protein levels within a man made bait. It is readily proven that a coarse fish needs a certain level of protein and lots and lots of exhaustive literature is available on the nutritional requirements of coarse fish. Trout pellets for example exceed these requirements in levels of protein and could possibly be dangerous in the long term; who knows barbel in these stretches may start growing extra fins!

as in extra barbules on the Avon a few years back.
I'm not saying here that HNV baits are not better than say a semolina and soya combo because in my experience they clearly are better; they inherently contain more attractive ingredients, not because they are higher in protein. Conversely, for every trout pellet junkie someone knows of a sweetcorn sucker.
Fred Wilton got the bait right but the theory wrong in my opinion.