The subject was covered quite, heavily is the word il use last year. The trouble is, not all rivers are the same, the way the Stour and Avon run are completely different despite being literally joined. So national recommendations are a bit broad, I saw the state of some of the rivers last year and some were virtually running backwards. The Stour was hot and low but it’s been far lower.
There are many factors that effect the recovery of a fish, oxygen is a large factor and that in itself has many other factors that effect it. Measurement of temperature and flow are good tools but they aren’t an o2 measurement. Equally is there a paper or reference that states that at X o2 content recovery of Barbel is affected? There has to be a point but if that’s unknown and we measure, what standard are we working to? If that’s unknown is the measurement valid?
Compare the Avon, which is running around 21c average peak daytime temp at present, (which is admittedly at the higher end of normal but isn’t abnormal) to the Wye. Currently the Wye is as far as I’m aware low and warm, it’s also experiencing an algae bloom which will have a significant impact of oxygen levels. We don’t have that issue, or as far as I’m aware any other compounding issues. The Avon as I’m sure you are aware isn’t a spate river, it’s a chalk stream fed from aquaifers so the level and flow is primarily impacted by the level here rather than like the Stour, a spate river who’s primary impact is rain fall (or should be anyway, that’s a different conversation) so there reaction to warm dry weather is quite different. It’s been suggested that the Avon is typically 2c cooler than the Stour.
The choice really is up to you as John says, make a reasonable assessment or the situation based on your experience, knowledge and evidence. I totally respect your concerns but there’s too many variables to just apply a national approach.
All in my opinion of corse. Sorry for the long reply but I wanted to be comprehensive and explain things to a point we’re they wouldn’t be misconstrued.