Cliff Turner
Senior Member & Supporter
Ive got the Wychwood spoon in medium, plenty big enough for mid size doubles, very good value for the money, folds away easy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rob,@Bill Walford sorry to call you out Bill I did read in a thread from earlier last year that you were going to get the Tackle Box 32 inch specialist net, did you end up getting one? If so how do you find it size wise? I messaged Tackle Box and they came back with a recommendation to get the 36 for when a bigger fish turns up, but realistically most of the fish I catch are of a more moderate size with the Trent trips being the only time i'm bothered by doubles I'm just wondering if a 32 would cover nearly all my fishing, noting that both the 32 & 36 have deeper mesh than the smaller nets in the range... Thanks
Rob,
I got a 36” only because my local club puts a 36” minimum size on landing nets for carp and although I don’t need it for my Tenching there’s a risk that one of the scaley backed buggers will come along and I don’t want aggro with the bailiffs, some of ‘em have been reading Mein Kampf as it is ! The 32” or even a 28” (with a deeper mesh) would suit 95% of my fishing for sure but to be honest I stuck with my 30” folding pan nets for my Barbel fishing. 90% of the lads inTB are carpers so they would recommend the larger net anyway in my opinion.
Hope this rambling helps
Regards
Bill
Now you are putting me on the spot Rob. Yes I did physically handle a 32”, would I be happy to use one for MY Barbelling YES! Why didn’t I buy one ? ‘Cos I took stock and have landing nets coming out of my ears !… there are unquestionable advantages in how the net packs down and will fit in a holdall but my folding spoon can be carried in my seat and when I go to the Trent I take two and they don’t take up any room on my barrow. If I didn’t have the spoons I would definitely have two of the TB nets and if I didn’t have Drennan handles I WOULD have the TB extending handle (x2)Yes and no Bill but I appreciate the extensive reply have you had a physical hold of the 32 version? I do wonder how it compares to say a 30 inch spoon for size. I think these TB nets have nice tight arms that bend into a slightly better (rounder?) shape rather than a straight edged triangle, which would appear to offer a better opening. I think this is what TB call a "pleasing shape"
You did right to get the 36 bill.Rob,
I got a 36” only because my local club puts a 36” minimum size on landing nets for carp and although I don’t need it for my Tenching there’s a risk that one of the scaley backed buggers will come along and I don’t want aggro with the bailiffs, some of ‘em have been reading Mein Kampf as it is ! The 32” or even a 28” (with a deeper mesh) would suit 95% of my fishing for sure but to be honest I stuck with my 30” folding pan nets for my Barbel fishing. 90% of the lads inTB are carpers so they would recommend the larger net anyway in my opinion.
Hope this rambling helps
Regards
Bill
Blimey Rich, If I fill a 36” I’ll be beside myself!You did right to get the 36 bill.
You’ll appreciate its dimensions when we get out on the Nene one day
It’s 36 inch along the diagonals. It’s only 30 inch from spreader to string and I know you’ve caught plenty of barbel over 30 inch.Blimey Rich, If I fill a 36” I’ll be beside myself!
Exactly what I was thinkingReally useful pic @Richard Isaacs can you do a pic of a 30 spoon with a 32 triangle please
Take a look at the Tackle Box triangles Steve, arms seem to have a lovely bend to them which would offer a more substantial opening than a straight armed triangle. The 32 and 36 nets are advertised as having deeper mesh, the smaller ones are a shallow mesh. Added bonus a folding triangle will stash away much neater than a fixed or folding spoon for that matterExactly what I was thinking
Also wondered how deep the mesh is. I'm currently using a Greys spoon which has a lovely deep mesh but can be awkward to handle.
Steve
Nice one Rich, interesting!Don’t have a 32 I’m afraid but not difficult to see where it would be.
Take 4 inches off the diagonal arms and your there.
This is gonna be about right View attachment 17487
Huge difference between a 30 spoon and a 32 triangleNice one Rich, interesting!