Chris Netto
Active Member
Just caught a comment on the landing net handle post which raised a question.
Back in 2004ish I was on a BFW fish-in on the Teme where I met a fellow BFWer who I still fish with.
He introduced me to the Okuma Interceptor 30BF. A cheap (£20) baitrunner. It came with two spools and an excellent clutch. Was really light and took 110yards of 12lb line. Just right for barbelling small rivers and still allowing a cast of about 60m if required. I have four of them (one free) and they are still going strong. With only three BBs they do feel the strain a little every summer as when on a shallow lake I fish, one has to wade and then cast as far as you can meaning a 100yard plus retrieval at times.
But their reliability has meant these (with different line BS) are my 1st reels of choice for most fishing apart from carp, catfish or pike. And even then it is dependent on the size of the water.
When the new Shimmano mini bait runners came out a couple of years back I was tempted to buy a couple, but resisted the urge to replace the Okumas. There is undoubtedly a quality difference (and pleasure of using issue?) but this also means a heavier reel.
Now here is the question. If I spend £25 on a 'cheap' but good enough reel which I can replace easily after a few years for a more modern model, is that more of a saving than spending £80 on a reel, which will no doubt last longer, but will be old technology-wise before it gives up the ghost. Ie is being able to buy every 4 years better than having to buy every 8?
Perhaps a better question would be how long do you expect your reels to last? A sort of business 'write-down' angle. If I was regularly winding in 3oz of lead over 100 yards I am sure I would have gone for more quality and size. Also included is the fact that there has been little development in fixed spool reels to speak of. So is 'the latest' any better than what you bought years ago?
Chris
Back in 2004ish I was on a BFW fish-in on the Teme where I met a fellow BFWer who I still fish with.
He introduced me to the Okuma Interceptor 30BF. A cheap (£20) baitrunner. It came with two spools and an excellent clutch. Was really light and took 110yards of 12lb line. Just right for barbelling small rivers and still allowing a cast of about 60m if required. I have four of them (one free) and they are still going strong. With only three BBs they do feel the strain a little every summer as when on a shallow lake I fish, one has to wade and then cast as far as you can meaning a 100yard plus retrieval at times.
But their reliability has meant these (with different line BS) are my 1st reels of choice for most fishing apart from carp, catfish or pike. And even then it is dependent on the size of the water.
When the new Shimmano mini bait runners came out a couple of years back I was tempted to buy a couple, but resisted the urge to replace the Okumas. There is undoubtedly a quality difference (and pleasure of using issue?) but this also means a heavier reel.
Now here is the question. If I spend £25 on a 'cheap' but good enough reel which I can replace easily after a few years for a more modern model, is that more of a saving than spending £80 on a reel, which will no doubt last longer, but will be old technology-wise before it gives up the ghost. Ie is being able to buy every 4 years better than having to buy every 8?
Perhaps a better question would be how long do you expect your reels to last? A sort of business 'write-down' angle. If I was regularly winding in 3oz of lead over 100 yards I am sure I would have gone for more quality and size. Also included is the fact that there has been little development in fixed spool reels to speak of. So is 'the latest' any better than what you bought years ago?
Chris