• You need to be a registered member of Barbel Fishing World to post on these forums. Some of the forums are hidden from non-members. Please refer to the instructions on the ‘Register’ page for details of how to join the new incarnation of BFW...

Would you ban the use of braid?

The most amazing part of this thread is that a club can impose a ban without giving their reasons to the members, unbelievable but not surprising, no doubt they will shortly be moaning about a drop in membership and wondering why

Best Regards
Dave
 
Bit of a joke this thread....anglers that use braid responsibly slagging the men off that have run the club for many years....these guys tend to have the clubs overall interests as the paramount inmportance in there descisions.

I would imagine that's the way it is...they might be misinformed....they might be nieve.... but they have run the club for many a year and kept it going, if you have objections... join the committee and speak to people face to face

Some of the most intersting people I have met are older people who have spent there life running clubs and associations...you might not think they are as clever as you lot.....but they are hell of alot wiser

Just speak to them

Cheers
Jason
 
The most amazing part of this thread is that a club can impose a ban without giving their reasons to the members, unbelievable but not surprising, no doubt they will shortly be moaning about a drop in membership and wondering why

Best Regards
Dave

So Dave if a quality barbel river banned braid would you not join next year

Get a grip?

Cheers
Jason
 
Leyton, Dave, a club I am not joining again this year has:

2 years ago banned pellets just after we renewed our membership.

Last year, recinded the pellet ban after loads of us complained, imposed a one rod only rule, and stopped people having a social session by imposing a only one angler per swim rule..........again, just after membership renewal time.

This is a club with only around 150 members which charges more per year than any other local club and makes all these silly rules on the say so of a famous bait maker who happens to be the fishery manager without any consultation with the membership..............................
 
Ian, move up north mate and grace the banks of the Trent - No silly rules here and hardly anyone on the banks.
 
Jon, I started off up North mate but finished up down here with the jellied eel eating shandy drinkers, Trent would be the wrong side for me though, a Ribble man really.........;)
 
So Dave if a quality barbel river banned braid would you not join next year

I meant they could lose members due to their poor communication skills not the fact that they were actually banning the braid

get a grip

Best Regards
Dave
 
The Chairman on Monday

Subject: Close Season Musing


Something that occurred to me just now: might our friends the otters be using pink braid?


As ever,

B.B.
 
I've shied away from using braid as a mainline for years after fairly poor experiences (a damaged fish, not by me, and just plain old poor performance) of its early incarnations. I've stuck to mono, and fairly large diameter mono at that, for all my big fish angling. However, a fairly recent trip to the Trent had me convinced that braid is definitely the way to go on the big rivers. It'll have a fairly generous helping of rig tube applied when I do use it though. The only reasons that I can think of for banning the stuff are, fish damage due to poor angling. However, I suspect that much of the little evidence to support this will be based on experiences of old fashioned braids and careless angling. I also suspect that ignorance of big fish angling techniques will also play a part. Many match/general anglers simply don't understand how 10lb + line can possibly be safe and not leave fish tethered. The fact that, due to the low diameters of modern braid, anglers are often using 15-20lb braid has them running scared. I'll confess that I still wince a little when such high breaking strain figures are mentioned. Just the same as I struggle to get my head around carp anglers using hooklengths well in excess of the breaking strain of their mainline. That's the match/general angler in me harking back to always using bottoms of lower breaking strain than my mainline. Folk using 50-100lb lines for fishing lures makes me shiver a little. While I can understand why it's done, I won't be doing it myself. The thought of getting seriously snagged with such heavy line leaves me cold.
 
On the large rivers like the Trent it does give the angler more pro's than con's. Such as less friction/tow = less weight used, I for one wouldnt be without it. However i do fish with a fluoro/mono leader above the hooklength, which provides total safety of the braid ever cutting a fish. Onto this i have incorporated my own breakaway lead clip, which reduces the risk of tethering. Maybe this could be introduced into your club Leyton, either fishing with some tubing covering the braid or a leader?
By fishing braid straight through, your more prone to getting cut off on snags and rocks, increasing tethering, also filleting would be a thing of the past. IMO

Like the idea of tube covering the braid. Never had a problem with braid, but if it were a concern, then this is a good solution.
 
Thanks Guys, all views are welcomed as that is what i wanted, your experience.

I'm sure now that if braid was a major issue in barbel welfair there would be noticable damage on the fish we catch each year across most rivers due to amount of anglers using the stuff.Surely the bigger fish would be battered and scaleless after years of capture on braided hooklinks and lenghts if it was the case.

Ant, the club will remain nameless on this open board so i guess you'll have to attend the AGM's of your own clubs to see if you could be effected by these suggested changes.

As is posted above the barbel anglers of the club will be out in force for this one all 14 of us should make for a good night, i just hope we have enough votes on the board to see it off.

Leyton
 
Mmm braid, dont and wouldnt use it myself as i have seen a few fish badly damaged by it, but as an earlier post said if it did it all of the time then surely many of the fish we catch would be damaged,I know many people who use it and have never had a fish damaged by it, so i guess its up to the individual but trust me if you have seen what it can do to a fish you wouldnt use it, perhaps thats what has happened here, a club official has had a bad experience using it or seen some badly damaged fish and decided that banning is the way forward.
 
Really, you need to provide the evidence as mono and landing net damage has the same features. Often, the fish could already have damage on its body prior to landing and it is not uncommon to believe that you have caused this with your own tackle to where your line, braid or mono, has been caught up in the split fins etc.
Generally it is the 'rigs, weights, feeders etc 'attached' to the line that cause snagging and not the line itself!
Mono, i have to say is not as reliable in strength as braid (if you know how to use it properly) and you will definately land more fish and more fish safely, other than breaking off more often with mono thus leaving baited rigs in the water and hooks left in the fishes mouths etc.
 
Just came across this article on exactly the same subject may help some of you guys with outstanding braid issue's (sorry Andy F, it's from another forum)


Some clubs are banning braided lines, including braided hooklengths - Kryston boss Dave Chilton puts the record straight

About 18 months ago I had a letter from FISHINGmagic member and contributor Jeff Woodhouse. Jeff said he had a problem in that a club he was a member of had banned braid, including hooklengths. Since the carp angling members wanted to use it he wrote to me for my thoughts on the subject.

The following lengthy reply not only helped to get the ban lifted, but also answers some of the concerns that many anglers still have today about braid......
Letter to Jeff Woodhouse
My company, Kryston, produces the worlds largest range of specialist braided hooklengths. Over the past 13 years we have built up a tremendous reputation of supplying to anglers both at home and abroad braided hooklengths made specifically for carp fishing. Each braid has different levels of behaviour i.e. slowly sinking, neutral buoyancy, anti-tangle coatings, etc, in fact over 30 different types. The reason my giving you that particular piece of information is to convey to you that I do know what I am talking about unlike many in the tackle industry that don't know a hook from a swivel.
Every single braided line we produce for the public has been designed by myself right down to the last detail. The contents of material, the construction, the tension, the degree of extension, the picks per inch and many more technical configurations for the perfect braid, and in every single case the primary objective has been one of SAFETY to the fish! As a manufacturer we have a responsibility to produce products which are totally safe and if there was any doubt about the suitability of any braid we had designed, it simply would never have seen the light of day.
Braided lines are nothing new, many anglers are totally unaware that Richard Walker caught his famous record carp back in 1952 on a braided line! Yes, that long ago. Braided lines when constructed correctly will always be much kinder to fish than any mono ever will be. That is proven fact, not fiction.
The reason is very clear, a braided line is not a solid, hard line like mono, a braided line is produced from extremely soft materials which are woven together in varying degrees of tension. When a correctly constructed braided hooklength is passed over an object such as a fish's mouth the braid has the ability to flatten by following the contours of the mouth. This is why many anglers prefer braids for the superb presentation they offer; as a fish mouths the bait the braid is less conspicuous if it is soft and can flatten as opposed to a piece of stiff, solid nylon. The degree of softness and flattening varies with different constructions and combinations.
As the braid flattens it spreads, slightly increasing its surface area of contact. This increase in surface area only takes place where the braid enters the carp's mouth and makes contact then flexes over the lips. This means that pressure being applied by the angler and fish during the fight is absorbed by the braid spreading the load over its increased surface area. Many braids are actually thicker than their mono counterparts and consequently have a surface area greater than mono.
As with all lines, braids and monos alike, all the pressure ends up on a tiny piece of the carp's flesh. The thinner the line being used the greater the pressure becomes. The thicker the line used, the lesser the pressure that occurs. Think of the difference of the load being spread between a cheesewire and a tape measure.
As an example try holding a piece of our multi-strand over your finger, even with the slightest bit of pressure you cannot fail to notice how the multi-strand filaments flatten, spreading themselves out to conform to the shape of the finger. So as far as mouth damage is concerned, well-designed braided hooklengths and multi-strands will cause less damage than mono which cannot spread and flatten itself.
ABRASION RESISTANCE
There appears to be a great deal of confusion concerning the words 'abrasion resistance'. All of our braided hooklengths are made using abrasion resistant materials but they certainly are not abrasive! Some people cannot get it into their heads that you can have an abrasion resistant line that is not abrasive.
One angler worried about braids asked me if you saw a braid back and forth would it create damage to the fish? I inquired how the hell was he playing his fish? When a hook has been driven home it usually remains in a fixed position, the hooklength cannot move back and forward in a carp's mouth, such as the sawing action described. The only possible movement that can take place is when the hooklength, whilst playing the fish, can move to either side of the mouth.
In open water the hooklength occasionally passes across the mouth area when the fish has turned, swimming away from you, which is the time you get that heart wrenching twang as the line crosses the fishes back, but in the main the hooklength will stay put. When playing fish in the margins the carp will often twist and turn, but movement of line across the back is restricted due to the angle to the rod, the angler being almost on top of the fish. It is these very circumstances that show the true worth of braided lines, they are kinder to fish than any mono.
Kryston braided hooklengths are also substantially softer than nylon mono. HOLD ON! Softness is only part of the story. What is required is a hooklength that, in points of importance is as follows:- totally safe, non-injurious, strong enough, reliable, and simple to use.
It is a well known fact that Snake-bite is the biggest selling carp hooklength on sale throughout Europe. It is also fact that because of its coating it is also the kindest of all hooklengths on sale. We really do care about our sport, its not all about money. Our now famous Snake-skin, which was the forerunner to Snake-bite, is not a braid (braids are woven), but a multi-filament hooklength with an added plastic coating. Following its launch it was hailed by many leading writers as the safest hooklength on sale. All of our coated lines, including our new Super Mantis are totally safe because of the cushioning effect of the plastic coating.
"BRAIDED MAINLINES NOT RECOMMENDED!"
You will be aware that I have written at length about properly designed braided lines manufactured for hooklengths. There are now braided lines on the market made for use as reel line or mainline. These lines are of an extremely low diameter and should never be used as hooklengths! Some are braided very tight with an extremely high pick count to reduce the diameter and are constructed too tight to flatten. Some are lines made from filaments which have been fused together using modern-day resins. All braided reel lines should be used on the reel and not the hook due to their cheese-cutting abilities. There are many braided reel or casting lines available, Fireline, Fusion, Spiderwire, Suffix, plus many, many more. Once again I would recommend only purpose designed braided lines for use as hooklengths.
Extremely tight super-low-diameter braided reel lines should be avoided and if braided reel lines are used at all they should always be used with a buffer. In other words at least 18 feet of mono tied to the end of the braid. Anglers using braided reel lines tied straight to the swivel on the rig are only waiting for an accident to happen. Should any fish reach a snag, the angler would be forced to pull for a break with the braid snapping anywhere along its length.
I have to say that Kryston advanced hooklengths are used by the most respected anglers in the country. The list reads like the 'Who's Who' of carp fishing. Jim Gibbinson, Tim Paisley, Andy Little, Matt Hayes, Julian Cundiff, Terry Hearn, Chris Ball, Lee Jackson, Martin Locke, Kevin Maddocks, the list goes on and on. None of the anglers are sponsored by Kryston; they choose to use our hooklengths because they do not damage fish. We take great pride knowing that anglers of such great integrity choose to use our products, they and thousands of others would not use them if they damaged fish.
USING THE CORRECT STRENGTH
Due to the fact that today virtually all mono's are labelled with their strengths vastly underrated the angler should take into account the following. The rod bends during the fight and helps to absorb pressure. Monofilament line stretches, again absorbing pressure. The braided hooklength has no stretch and so all the pressure from the rod, mono, and fish ends up on the hooklength!
It is no great secret that many popular monos are underrated in strength. Berkley Big Game 12lb is nothing of the sort. It's actually around 17lb knotted. Gardner GR60 is the same as are many modern monofilaments. The reason for this crazy state of affairs is the marketing men, "Good stuff this 12lb mono, you cannot break it, you will be impressed." Of course you can't break it, its bloody 17lb and as thick as any other 17lb mono! Which brings us on to balanced tackle, if you really knew that you were fishing with a 17lb mono reel line would you use a 10lb hooklength? Would you hell!
Should you be concerned that a stronger hooklength may force the weaker reel line to break anywhere along its length resulting in the fish trailing yards of mono, do not be. Mono will always break at its weakest point which is the knot tied to the rig. The end result will be the fish swimming away with nothing more than a short hooklength which loosens its grip in as little as a few hours, certainly within a couple of days, and the hook coming free. As long as rigs are safe with nothing to keep the lead captive, 25lb hooklengths can be used with all modern rigs. Once again I will stress that all wider diameter lines are much kinder to fish.
In these modern times more carp are being successfully landed than ever before. Ten to fifteen years ago more carp were lost. This change occurred because tackle became more efficient. Stronger hooklengths which cope better against abrasion are one of the main reasons why fewer carp are lost today.
Fine line and tiny hooks really have no place in carp fishing. The main cause for concern is when a fish breaks the line, leaving tiny hooks in the fish's mouth, since a carp will never dislodge a tiny hook, even barbless, easily. The very fine wire of a small hook will penetrate the flesh all the way down to the bend of the hook making it extremely difficult for the fish to dislodge whereas the much thicker wire used for larger hooks will be far easier and quicker to loosen in the fish's mouth. It's well known that on many mixed day-ticket waters many fish caught by anglers using sensible tackle have tiny hooks attached to fragile line firmly embedded in their flesh.
Another fallacy that wants blowing wide open is the thinking behind hooks, barbed or barbless, it makes little difference when ridiculously tiny hooks are being used for larger species! Until we get rid of the mentality that we will catch more and bigger fish by using finer line than stronger, thicker line the sooner the better for all concerned. Any angler using baits intended for larger species should only be allowed to use them if his tackle is substantial enough for the job in hand. Carp are a valuable commodity worth many hundreds or thousands of pounds. No club or organization wants to see their investment rotting in the margins due to some misguided fool using totally unsuitable tackle. After all, its only common sense.
As a rough guide I recommend the following mono to hooklength combinations.
8lb reel line 10lb or 12lb braided hooklength
10lb reel line 12lb or 15lb braided hooklength
12lb reel line 15lb or 25lb braided hooklength
15lb reel line 25lb or above braided hooklength
Some may cringe at the thought of using a 25 lb hooklength, but it is not just the strength, it's the texture of the braid which is important for the job in hand. Even though the line is stronger the angler cannot apply more pressure than the test curve of the rod he is using. No matter how much pressure the angler applies they usually cannot apply more than 3lbs pressure due to the rod bending - for those who doubt me try it using a set of scales, the proof is there.
Some anglers voice concern that modern day braids can be dangerous as they do not break down in water and could be a hazard to tethered fish. Should a fish become tethered to 15lb mono the fish would be dead long before the mono broke down, at least 2 years and more, so it would be foolish to blame braids alone as mono is no better!
 
Leyton, You cant beat an experts view on this subject, especially Dave Chilton of Kryston. I don't feel so guilty now using 30lb braided hooklength:eek:
 
I can see that large scaled, deep bodied fish, i.e carp, might possibly have a problem with fine diameter lines lifting the odd scale but to cut a fish in half, as has been suggested, you would have to be some sort of Neanderthal pulling for a break with a towel or something similar to protect your hands. I fail to see how one could cause that sort of damage in a normal angling situation.


Dave Chiltern said

Even though the line is stronger the angler cannot apply more pressure than the test curve of the rod he is using. No matter how much pressure the angler applies they usually cannot apply more than 3lbs pressure due to the rod bending - for those who doubt me try it using a set of scales, the proof is there.

Like I said, the only way you will cut a fish with braid is by poor angling practice. Try as you will you can never legislate for stupidity.
 
Incorrect use!!!

Braid is very strong for its diameter, and if used in the lower breaking strains can and does cut into the flank of the fish if the fish is unlucky enough to roll up the line.
There is also the risk of fish becoming tethered if using poorly designed rigs and heavy braid (saying that, there is still a risk of fish becoming tethered when using mono too).

I've written about this before, but I had the misfortune of having a Barbel roll up the line and the braid I was using (20lb Spiderwire) cut a huge slice into the flank of the fish.
This was about 15 years ago, and I've never used braid for Barbel fishing since.

If used correctly, ie for drift float fishing for Pike for example, or lure fishing, I don't have a problem with it and it certainly puts more fish on the bank under those circumstances, but in harsh environments like rivers, I'm not happy myself to use it. It cuts too easily on snags like rocks too.

I know there will be hundreds that use it without any problems, but most are sensible. It only takes a few fools using it, combined with 'death rigs' to have committees banning it.

Why do you feel Braid is 'better' than mono for targeting Barbel?


Steve

Like I said, the only way you will cut a fish with braid is by poor angling practice. Try as you will you can never legislate for stupidity.


:rolleyes:

Stupid am I?

:(

Steve
 
Back
Top