. We talk of Dick Walker , surely a early fish chaser?, but not thought of any the less I hope . Crabtree book shut.
Yes indeed he was an early 'fish chaser', some would argue one of the original.
These days its not just Dick and a few of his cronies, the specimen scene has exploded.
Now you'd get a Billy-no-name catching the first mahoosive fish, followed by a whole heap of 'named' angler (journalist tackle consultant types) and then by this point the stretch will be hard, very hard......... The names will move on and the thrones of hopefulls decend............ An all to familiar scene, I'd say?!
And yes all (well most) of us are guilty to greater or lesser a degree of 'fish chasing'.
Me, when looking at a new water for tench, I'll always ask about a bit to establish how much potential it has because yes to me pounds and ounces DO count, sad but true!
Back to the thread question:
Apart from the known stretches the Thames, like touched on by Paul, has huge untapped potential.
Up here in Oxfordshire, excluding one stretch where it is possible to drive to your chosen swim and fish out of your car, none of the other areas ever saw another angler (unless they only ever fished on my old swims, poor buggers!).
Why is this, for a river that produces 9lb chub and barbel into high teens, easy answer; fish chasers like the easy option, i.e there's a 18lb barbel on this weir or that gravel run and not there may possibly be a barbel somewhere along that three mile stretch of river.
Also the river is usually so murky fish spotting is hard, if not impossible.
Therefore putting many off, sorry, no recent form, can't see the fish, doesn't put many off it puts nigh on everyone off!