Dave Quinn
Senior Member & Supporter
Joe, by referencing consumerism when discussing Adam’s purchasing of fishing rods he won’t use, and then talking about the “enormous externalized environmental cost” that consumerism has you are suggesting that he’s contributing to the problem in an immoral way, however small that may beIt's a bit far fetched to suggest that anybody was suggesting buying custom fishing tackle is contributing to a moral collapse of society.
But it is undeniable that consumerism (in most sectors) carries a enormous externalised environmental cost and that tab will have to be picked up by future generations. You aren't going to convince me that buying tackle with the intention of never using it is good for angling (or anybody) in the long term.
Truth is Adam might not have the intention of using it but that doesn’t mean the rod will get chucked in landfill or sit in an cupboard. It will be sold and used, a lot if he sold it to me. Well made, quality products, built to last are not the problem.
I bought a pair of Torrix’s second hand a couple of years ago, I use them for Barbel, Bream and Tench fishing, they’re pretty much the only rods I use these days, if they weren’t as good as they are I would have bought 4 cheaper rods, possibly new, to do the jobs they do.
I don’t think you can have it both ways, suggest that Adam is contributing the problems consumerism cause while ignoring the benefits his money brings to exactly the sort of businesses that should be supported if we want to bring consumerism under control.
People spending their money on quality fishing gear manufactured by British companies will always be good for our industry. If we don’t we lose them, and their place will be taken by people and companies who are driven by worse intentions
Last edited: