Jim Gregory
Senior Member
Which guides?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They are, so very light, but not as strong as metal I think.I thought they were carbon?
They’ll be much stronger than steel but far less ductile.They are, so very light, but not as strong as metal I think.
Yeah, that’s what I meant, your normal guides can bend, but this thing, if not look after correctly, will snap, take some force though.They’ll be much stronger than steel but far less ductile.
The warning is there because you won’t bend them you’ll shear them off but I reckon it will take some force
Correct it’s got none at all but it will flex a bit before permanent destructionCarbon isn't ductile at all!
I suppose we all did something wrong in the past.
View attachment 33057
The guides are definitely lighter than normal ones, I weighed the first two sections of the 13ft rod I have, same weight as the acolyte specimen, but the wall of the blank is much thicker, I assume the ags guides saved a lot weight.To be fair, I wouldn't do any of those things to normal metal guides. I've had the original Air AGS match rods for a few years now. They aren't my favourites, so they've not been heavily used, but I've had no issues with the guides. The smaller rings are all a bit too low for my preference. Float rods look like tip rods because of them. Whilst I'm not prepared to strip the rod for proof, I'm not entirely convinced that they offer a huge weight saving over normal metal framed guides.
Given a choice between the AGS guides and the seemingly unobtainable Fuji Titanium match guides, I'd have the Fuji every time.