Terry Simner
Senior Member & Supporter
Hi'yall. When I'm long trotting I invariably fish just the one swim all session (usually 3-5hrs)...and I think most other 'trotters' do the same : pick a swim, build it up, and fish it all sesh without a thought of moving. But for the last few seasons, when not ledgering, I've been combined rolling meat with long trotting (usually large wagg) and go 'freewagging'
Now my question is : When rolling meat/freelining any bait, do you think that a roving approach is better than a static one? Two things I see against a roving approach, are :
1/. good 'rolling' swims are less common than good ledgering swims, so it wouldn't be so easy to do a 'rolling-rove', and
2/. similar to when trotting, when rolling I often don't get any action for the first hour or so. It's as though (like trotting) a swim benefits from being 'built up' with careful baiting.
Thoughts? Anyone found 'Roving-rolling' to be more productive than the static approach?
ATB
Terry
Now my question is : When rolling meat/freelining any bait, do you think that a roving approach is better than a static one? Two things I see against a roving approach, are :
1/. good 'rolling' swims are less common than good ledgering swims, so it wouldn't be so easy to do a 'rolling-rove', and
2/. similar to when trotting, when rolling I often don't get any action for the first hour or so. It's as though (like trotting) a swim benefits from being 'built up' with careful baiting.
Thoughts? Anyone found 'Roving-rolling' to be more productive than the static approach?
ATB
Terry