Chris Belcher
Senior Member & Supporter
Maybe you've lobbed a grenade (lol) . . but who said I was 'new' to barbel fishing . . .? Without being condescending (which others on here find less difficult) looking at your photo Richard I'm guessing I'm older than you . . . which means I've been fishing a lot longer than you . . . FYI I caught my first barbel on the Kennet when I was about 12yrs old using a stickfloat and match tackle . . . .that was 1983 . . if I wasn't fishing on river, lakes or canals I was watching Saturday swop shop or playing football - Paul Mariner was the top striker of the time . . . .(sound like Des Taylor myself now lol)there’s nothing wrong with being quite new to barbel fishing but the last part of your quote...
That’s total b........ks
Sorry but it really is. They drop straight out of their mouths nearly every time. I reckon I’ve only had to unhook about 3 this year myself. If your not a fan of barbless hooks that’s great. Lots of people are with you on that for reasons that have been discussed over and over but to claim the hard mouth of a barbel keeps them lodged in as well as a barbed hook is nothing less than a mile from the truth.
you like to try things so I suggest you try it. Let the line go slack for a couple of seconds then tighten back up and see if she’s still there.
. . . .I've been fishing for ALL species for over 40 years - the last 20+ have been biased towards carp admittedly because they are more of a CHALLENGE . . .this has provided a very technical, broad knowledge chasing a significantly larger & heavier, faster, more powerful creature with a whole spectrum of tackle & techniques that is arguably more pressured (due to the popularity of the species) and therefore more difficult to catch. Fast forward this post and modern day barbel techniques - from my standpoint they ALL seem to lifted from carp fishing . . .you need to start asking yourself why . . . .?
What I'm finding outstanding is that rather than understanding or even considering a simple viewpoint (the algebra was a pseudo sarcastic piece of communication that I thought some might find amusing - I'm no mathematician and maybe my humour is warped!) there seems to be a blanket denial and ridicule in responses based on a what is quite clearly either a LACK of ACTUAL FISHING knowledge or indeed a very narrow one. If I am as assumed 'older' than you then that's surely a bit worrying . . .its supposed to be the old farts that are stuck in their ways . . .
A lot of the time it seems answers are being swerved and by simply reinforcing your own mantra (that to be fair is your prerogative) in reality this feels a little cliquey, lacklustre and not really in the spirit of open discussion . . .by stating something is total 'b*llocks' on open forum with very little other than a vague opinion to back it up is quite frankly embarrassing. I'd be lying if I didn't admit to throwing a few grenades of my own (for fun) . . however as I said eons ago - 'its only fishing ffs'.
Peace out . . .(for the time being . . )