Adam Wylie
Senior Member & Supporter
Hi all ,
would a 1.75 tc through action rod be considered to heavy for Chub fishing on the Trent ?
would a 1.75 tc through action rod be considered to heavy for Chub fishing on the Trent ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Adam, look at the Acolyte distance feeder rods, I have both 13 and 14ft which IMO are ideal, with many different quiver tip options available. They have enough grunt for dealing with large feeders at distance but also sensitive enough to use at shorter distance with finer hook lengthsHi all ,
would a 1.75 tc through action rod be considered to heavy for Chub fishing on the Trent ?
I'd just use a decent medium to heavy feeder rod buddy. (probably already mentioned)Hi all ,
would a 1.75 tc through action rod be considered to heavy for Chub fishing on the Trent ?
Didn't you sell some heavy feeder rods not too long ago? Maybe wrongHow about the CADENCE SPECIALIST 11ft x 1.5 tc twin tip ??
How lovely they looked good them but seem to have disappeared from his site now. Ive gone with a small water for a most of my small water work now combining a lot of rods into one. it will do a lot of everything well for my needs.I've just brought MTs multi tip 11 6 for my chubbing can't wait!
Not saying it will... But I'd like to see if that 'magic' section continues to be trouble free?When I was speaking to Mark, he mentioned that since he released his multi tip with the magic section, middy have since replicated it. Actually the rod in question is reviewed in this weeks AT. Looks nice for a chub but is £350!
I know which id prefer!
From my understanding of the magic section, it is about to have the same TC at the joint between two rods, so it can give you a nice bending curve. So even after a period of normal use, the carbon may wear down, changes the TC etc, and the magic section is not that magic. But I think this problem actually applies to all the rods?Not saying it will... But I'd like to see if that 'magic' section continues to be trouble free?
As I wonder if grit & debris could work between the sections, & wear the carbon down over time making it not a good locking fit?
Reminds me of the sort of issues we've experienced with Drennan twist lock poles etc.
Not really following that logic to be honest.Not saying it will... But I'd like to see if that 'magic' section continues to be trouble free?
As I wonder if grit & debris could work between the sections, & wear the carbon down over time making it not a good locking fit?
Reminds me of the sort of issues we've experienced with Drennan twist lock poles etc.
Exactly what Rich said..Not really following that logic to be honest.
The tips are just female overfits onto a male ground spigot……. No different to a lot of rod joints out there today except he’s done it with quiver tips to offer complete top sections.
The old normark feeder rods did something very similar years ago and they worked really well till people broke them.
Grit can get into any rod joint, if I feel it when putting a rod together I will remove and clean it out immediately or yes it will wreck the joints.
Drennan poles… again only failed because people neglected them. Mine was 11 years old and still going strong when I decided it was due a replacement.
It’s new owner might get another 10 years out of it
Absolutely no chance on this grade of carbon.From my understanding of the magic section, it is about to have the same TC at the joint between two rods, so it can give you a nice bending curve. So even after a period of normal use, the carbon may wear down, changes the TC etc, and the magic section is not that magic. But I think this problem actually applies to all the rods?