Richard Barrett
Senior Member
Nursery swim may not be the correct term, but I'm sure you'll know what I mean?
During my early days in the 'Chub Study Group' 1970s we called swims that produced lots of fish, but in lower weights nursery swims. The other type are those that only produce maybe one or two fish, but the stamp is much bigger.
I know several swims on the Trent where on a best day, you could take a dozen fish, but nothing over 7lb ish. In contrast some swims are almost strictly doubles only. The swims have distinct similarities with their type. The nursery swims are a little shallower than normal 4'-6' and often have some structure. Maybe a fallen tree, or underwater snag, often not seen.
The doubles only swims are often deeper 8' plus, can have underwater snags, but often none, but nothing seen to suggest 'why' it's so good for better fish.
Just to say this is not always a given but a distinct pattern I've observed over many years on several barbel and chub rivers. Has anyone else noticed such too?
It's worth saying with the chub, scale counts disproved the fish were juveniles.
During my early days in the 'Chub Study Group' 1970s we called swims that produced lots of fish, but in lower weights nursery swims. The other type are those that only produce maybe one or two fish, but the stamp is much bigger.
I know several swims on the Trent where on a best day, you could take a dozen fish, but nothing over 7lb ish. In contrast some swims are almost strictly doubles only. The swims have distinct similarities with their type. The nursery swims are a little shallower than normal 4'-6' and often have some structure. Maybe a fallen tree, or underwater snag, often not seen.
The doubles only swims are often deeper 8' plus, can have underwater snags, but often none, but nothing seen to suggest 'why' it's so good for better fish.
Just to say this is not always a given but a distinct pattern I've observed over many years on several barbel and chub rivers. Has anyone else noticed such too?
It's worth saying with the chub, scale counts disproved the fish were juveniles.