Darwin's theory is only relevant to barbel adapting and surviving Neil when the genes of the survivors are passed on to their offspring. Unfortunately in many of our rivers, after the otters have removed the mature brood stock there are no offspring. Without further stockings by the EA, barbel would undoubtedly cease to exist in many of our rivers. Signal crayfish and over abstraction are the main problems and with no solution on the horizon I'm afraid the future looks bleak. Before otters, regular stockings masked the abysmal state of some of our rivers, now it is all too apparent.
Nick C
Then of course as Lol has said fingerling stockings is only at best a PR stunt, the chance of a fingerling reaching maturity is slim in the extreme, as with all species, agreed, the only way a River such as the BA can get back to it's former self is with spawning, alas of course if there are not enough smaller males, and just the odd larger female, then the scenario is poor.
Not convinced the Otter should take the blame, you mention abstraction, and that has had a major effect on the BA headwaters around Sherston, it used to be a good area for all species, now it is on occasions merely a trickle, with no signs of any life.
Crayfish are they a huge problem on the Avon? I know the Thames was paved with them but didn't think the Avon suffered that much, but it must be 12 years since I fished the River.
The demise of the BA is sad, and for me it was where I first fell in love with Barbel, I just hope it is just a cycle , and that it will return to it's former self But remember the BA was hammered, the likes of Lacock especially so, I couldn't imagine that sort of angling pressure did the stocks any good whatsoever.
And then the floods of 2007, what damage that did we will never know, it certainly changed the Teme and the WA, it's a long healing process, and seven or eight years is nothing in the scheme of things.
No, I think it's wrong to lump all the blame on the Otter.