Just to put the record straight on this thread.
The Allis Shad is a protected species, you may not target the fish or harm its habitat. However, the Twaite Shad does not share the same level of protection. It has only the protection of its habitat from deliberate or reckless damage.
The legislation being used to protect the Twaite Shad comes from an umbrella law that states that it is an offence to damage either by intent or through a reckless or negligent act, any species who's protection goes to create a SSSI. This act includes all of the flora and fauna of that SSSI
It appears to be legislation created to prosecute those that pollute or damage habitat that can escape specific charges relating to individual species. The EA are using a sledgehammer to crack a walnut. Why? Because a handful of people spin for salmon on the Wye (usually around Symonds Yat and Monmouth) without a license. When asked for said license they claim to be fishing for shad which are not named on our licenses thus getting away with not having one.
This problem has been ongoing for a long time and the EA in its infinite wisdom has decided to blunder down a road of alleged conservation to stop a handful of salmon being poached.
My opinion (for what it's worth) is this. The salmon is probably in more danger of extinction than the shad but catching and killing them is still allowed and great resources are used to continue the sport. The shad however, is still quite plentiful and the number caught each year is minimal. They used to be harvested for their roe but that has long since stopped.
If there is concern over the shad, what better way of gaining support for the species is there than allowing us to fish for them. Ask most anglers and they have never heard of them, let them catch a few and their value will increase along with a voice to protect them.
It is a ridiculous application of the law and has not stopped any of the regulars from fishing for them, even the EA say that the chances of a prosecution are slight.
Sorry to go on
