• You need to be a registered member of Barbel Fishing World to post on these forums. Some of the forums are hidden from non-members. Please refer to the instructions on the ‘Register’ page for details of how to join the new incarnation of BFW...

Crayfish

when I used to fish the Kennet with Eipse pellets I found that I could leave the bait in for at least 20 mins, the rod tip would tap tap tap but if a barbel was present it would eventually slam round.
 
when I used to fish the Kennet with Eipse pellets I found that I could leave the bait in for at least 20 mins, the rod tip would tap tap tap but if a barbel was present it would eventually slam round.
yes Cliff, that's what I think happens ie the fish push to blighters out of the way. Did I read correctly that when they go soft shell twice a year the carp eat them?
ps the TSI has had some nice mid double carp lately. The handle was looking a bit sad, so I found my old brummer cork stopper, livened it up with a couple of liquids, glycol and oil and worked on the handle fishing with a light sand. Looks like new now, Very pleased with my little self and a very cheap useful nice rod. I think my sportex barbel 1 3/4 is probably the better caster but for handling , both seem very similar.
 
These look quite interesting if you haven't got the patience to soak/saturate wooden balls; and look better than the fiddly OMC offering


Never mind crayfish - mitten crabs on the Trent are the acid test; never tried it but they allegedly hate garlic doused baits. . .
 
Is there any bait crayfish won't eat. I read that they don't eat luncheon meat but also read that this isn't true.
I had experience on the Great Ouse with crayfish, and actually found that catching crays and using their tails by just removing the end flared scales, and giving them the occasional twitch worked really well. Had many big chub and perch on them. I also used to peel the shells off the tails and use the white meat inside on the Ivel and Nene, and they worked well too.
 
A mate believes that if you stamp on them, throw them back when dead two things happen. They eat each other and get a taste for it so reducing their numbers. Secondly fish start eating them and again develop a taste for them. If either is true it would help though surely not eradicate the problem, I did hear a theory that the increase in chub size is mainly on rivers holding crayfish as large chub have a liking for them. I can personally vouch for the fact that they taste good, eaten loads in the states.
 
These look quite interesting if you haven't got the patience to soak/saturate wooden balls; and look better than the fiddly OMC offering


Never mind crayfish - mitten crabs on the Trent are the acid test; never tried it but they allegedly hate garlic doused baits. . .
I wouldn't bother pal, they love garlic
 
These look quite interesting if you haven't got the patience to soak/saturate wooden balls; and look better than the fiddly OMC offering


Never mind crayfish - mitten crabs on the Trent are the acid test; never tried it but they allegedly hate garlic doused baits. . .
Good idea but it doesn't stop them snipping the hair.
 
I had experience on the Great Ouse with crayfish, and actually found that catching crays and using their tails by just removing the end flared scales, and giving them the occasional twitch worked really well. Had many big chub and perch on them. I also used to peel the shells off the tails and use the white meat inside on the Ivel and Nene, and they worked well too.
I can see that that would work, but is it legal? You're not supposed to return signal crayfish.
 
Be wary, some regions will no longer grant licences to trap signals. I've heard two reasons: people struggle to differentiate small Signals from native crayfish. Then there's the theory that removing big Signals just ends up with having loads of small ones.
 
Be wary, some regions will no longer grant licences to trap signals. I've heard two reasons: people struggle to differentiate small Signals from native crayfish. Then there's the theory that removing big Signals just ends up with having loads of small ones.
Yep, if they can't be returned or killed what happens to them?. Probably they get older and become politicians, ie no use to man nor beast.
 
Be wary, some regions will no longer grant licences to trap signals. I've heard two reasons: people struggle to differentiate small Signals from native crayfish. Then there's the theory that removing big Signals just ends up with having loads of small ones.

The latter is true, as the biggest consumer of juvenile crayfish is adult crayfish, so if you trap the larger ones, you end up with even more. This is why the E.A can be reluctant to grant trapping consent.

When they first appear, you get a massive population glut, before it peaks and tails off before stabilising.
 
Next time you catch a Cray stamp on him and chuck him in the margin…within a short time there’ll be a cannibal feeding frenzy, they live eating there own kind…vile creatures but guess it demonstrated why there so successful at adapting to different environments! I also noticed recently a well known tropical aquarium fish chain store selling two different species of freshwater crayfish - I wonder how many of these outgrow tanks at home for their owners to then just release them into local waters?
 
Good idea but it doesn't stop them snipping the hair.
Wouldn't fish them on a hair . . . my crayfish proof wooden balls have rig rings glued in so I'd go for this option and fish on a D Rig / D Rig Kicker or most likely direct to the hook (with hookbeads). You could create little 1" 'mini leadcore' hairs and splice them to the hookbait ring if you wanted more separation . . .but tbf with crays you need something that can vaguely 're-set' (as they're going to be knocked about) and keep the hook point from impaling in the bait cage . . .
 
Back
Top